MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309018553 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac209.1144

MODL-16. SOMATICALLY ENGINEERED MOUSE MODELS RECAPITULATING CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR FEATURES OF HUMAN GBM

2022· article· en· W4309018553 on OpenAlexaff
Joanna Pyczek, Bo Young Ahn, Heewon Seo, Samuel O. Lawn, Shannon Snelling, Katalin Osz, Robyn Flynn, A. Sorana Morrissy, Jennifer A. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPTENBiologyCDKN2ACancer researchPDGFRAContext (archaeology)PhenotypeMesenchymal stem cellPathologyStromal cellPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayGeneGeneticsMedicineSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION Mouse models are instrumental in advancing our understanding of glioblastoma (GBM), however many commonly used models have features that limit their practicality or applicability. These limitations can include an incomplete immune context, a requirement for complex breeding strategies, high cost of specialized lines, and unpredictability in where tumors arise. We sought to develop and validate a mouse modeling system for some of the major human GBM subtypes that overcame these practical challenges. METHODS In vivo electroporation was used to introduce genetic alterations into periventricular cells of early postnatal C57Bl6/j mice. PiggyBac transposon/transposase and CRISPR-Cas9 systems were used to overexpress (OE) or knock out (KO) genes associated with mesenchymal (Nf1-KO/Pten-KO/p53-KO), classical (EGFRvIII-OE/Cdkn2a-KO/Pten-KO), and proneural (Pdgfra-OE/Cdk4-OE/p53-KO) IDH-WT GBM subtypes. KO or OE was confirmed by Indel Detection by Amplicon Analysis and immunofluorescent staining (IF). Tumours were analyzed for histologic, immunohistochemical, and transcriptional (RNAseq) features. RESULTS Tumors arose with near complete penetrance and median survivals of 36 to 116 days amongst models. All tumors were GFAP-expressing high-grade gliomas, with distinct phenotypes associated with different genetic combinations. Nf1-KO/Pten-KO/p53-KO tumors were composed of spindle cells. EGFRvIII-OE/Cdkn2a-KO/Pten-KO and Pdgfra-OE/Cdk4-OE/p53-KO tumors showed prevalence of small, round cells. Molecularly, Nf1-KO/Pten-KO/p53-KO tumors were enriched for human mesenchymal signature and displayed more differentiated phenotype. The Nf1-KO/Pten-KO/p53-KO model also showed increased stromal cells and macrophages. The other models had mixed proneural and classical profiles and were enriched for OPC- and NPC-like gene signatures found in human GBM. Once tumors formed, cells from each model were transplantable into C57Bl6/j mice to generate subsequent tumors. CONCLUSION We developed and validated a rapid, versatile, and reproducible system to model GBMs. These models allow for controlled study of GBM pathogenesis, progression, and treatment response, and allow for robust generation of syngeneic implantable mouse models that can serve as valuable tools for preclinical testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207