Germline determinants of the prostate tumor genome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A person’s germline genome strongly influences their risk of developing cancer. Yet the molecular mechanisms linking the host genome to the specific somatic molecular phenotypes of individual cancers are largely unknown. We quantified the relationships between germline polymorphisms and somatic mutational features in prostate cancer. Across 1,991 prostate tumors, we identified 23 co-occurring germline and somatic events in close 2D or 3D spatial genomic proximity, affecting 10 cancer driver genes. These driver quantitative trait loci (dQTLs) overlap active regulatory regions, and shape the tumor epigenome, transcriptome and proteome. Some dQTLs are active in multiple cancer types, and information content analyses imply hundreds of undiscovered dQTLs. Specific dQTLs explain at least 16.7% ancestry-biases in rates of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions and 67.3% of ancestry-biases in rates of FOXA1 point mutations. These data reveal extensive influences of common germline variation on somatic mutational landscapes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".