MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S30 A Phase 2b Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic SER-287 in Mildly-to-Moderately Active UC

2022· article· en· W4310871604 on OpenAlexaff
Brian G. Feagan, David T. Rubin, Stephen Hanauer, William Sandborn, Shiraz Farooq, Henry Levine, Caterina Oneto, David I. Lichter, Gabrielle Glick, Kelly Brady, Barbara McGovern, Sherry Wang‐Weigand, Mark Sostek, Lisa Grier, David H. Kerman, Bharat Misra, Kenolisa Onwueme, Jeffrey Axler, Lisa Von Moltke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineUlcerative colitisPlaceboGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseConcomitantPhases of clinical researchClinical trialDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) drug development has mainly targeted moderate-to-severe disease while few agents have been approved for mild disease. When first-line drugs fail in patients with mild disease, therapeutic options often include steroids and immunosuppressives with modest efficacy and increased risk of infections and malignancy. Microbiome disruption characterized by depletion of Firmicutes bacteria has been postulated to play a role in the pathogenesis of UC. SER-287 is an investigational oral formulation of purified Firmicutes spores designed to produce metabolites associated with maintenance of the intestinal barrier integrity and improved mucosal immunity. A previous Phase 1b study of patients with mildly-to-moderately active UC demonstrated that SER-287 following vancomycin pre-conditioning was well-tolerated and provided clinical benefit. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b study screened 494 adults and randomized 203 (51.7% male; mean age 45.6 years; 83.7% White) 1:1:1 to SER-287 Induction Dose, SER-287 Step-Down Induction Dose, or placebo, and stratified subjects by baseline endoscopic score (ES 1-2 vs 3) and by concomitant use of UC medications at baseline (5-ASA alone vs immunomodulators +/- 5-ASA vs none). Subjects were required to have mildly-to-moderately active UC at screening: ≥ 15 cm of disease from the anal verge, and a Three-Component Modified Mayo Score of 3-7, composed of ES ≥ 1, determined by local and central reader scores, with adjudication by a second central reader, if necessary, stool frequency (SF) subscore ≥1, and rectal bleeding (RB) subscore (no eligibility requirement). Subjects were required to have inadequate or loss of response to, or intolerance of, ≥ 1 conventional UC therapy, and were permitted to remain on stable oral 5-ASAs and/or immunomodulators. SER-287 or placebo was administered as 2 oral capsules once-daily for 10 weeks following 6 days of pre-conditioning with oral vancomycin or placebo, respectively. Subjects who achieved clinical remission were randomized to a placebo-controlled maintenance treatment period, while non-remitters were eligible for open-label SER-287 Induction Dose. The primary endpoint was clinical remission with the SER-287 Induction Dose compared to placebo, defined as ES = 0/1 with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline, RB = 0, SF = 0/1 with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline, and no UC flares during the treatment period. Results: The study did not meet its primary endpoint of clinical remission (10.3% for the SER-287 Induction Dose vs 11.6% for placebo [adjusted difference of −1.3; P = 0.802; 95% confidence interval: −11.7, 9.0]). No meaningful differences were observed across the 3 groups for endoscopic improvement, endoscopic remission, or symptomatic remission. During induction, 76/133 (57.1%) subjects who received SER-287, vs 35/69 (50.7%) in placebo, experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate and dose-dependent. The most common TEAEs were worsening of UC, diarrhea, and nausea. Conclusion(s): SER-287 was not better than placebo for induction of clinical remission in mildly-to-moderately active UC. The therapy was generally well-tolerated. Future efforts will evaluate the impact of SER-287 on the microbiome and the role of biomarkers to identify patients with microbiome disruption who may benefit from microbiome-based therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicGut microbiota and health→French-language works237,207→