MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311284540 · doi:10.1002/glia.24321

Erratum to “N‐3 <scp>PUFA</scp> deficiency disrupts oligodendrocyte maturation and myelin integrity during brain development”

2022· erratum· en· W4311284540 on OpenAlexaff
Quentin Leyrolle, Fanny Decoeur, Cyril Déjean, Marie-Galadriel Briere, Stéphane Leon, Ioannis Bakogiannis, Emilie Baroux, Tony‐lee Sterley, Clémentine Bosch‐Bouju, Lydie Morel, Camille Amadieu, Cynthia Lecours, Marie‐Kim St‐Pierre, Maude Bordeleau, Alexandra Séré, Leslie Schwendimann, Stéphane Gregoire, Lionel Brétillon, Niyazi Acar, Corinne Joffre, Guillaume Ferreira, Raluca Uricaru, Patricia Thébault, Pierre Gressèns, Sophie Layé, Agnès Nadjar

Bibliographic record

VenueGlia · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité LavalUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Calgary
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsOligodendrocyteBiologyMyelinNeuroscienceBrain developmentCell biologyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article corrects the following:N-3 PUFA deficiency disrupts oligodendrocyte maturation and myelin integrity during brain developmentQuentin Leyrolle, Fanny Decoeur, Cyril Dejean, Galadriel Brière, Stephane Leon, Ioannis Bakoyiannis, Emilie Baroux, Tony-Lee Sterley, Clémentine Bosch-Bouju, Lydie Morel, Camille Amadieu, Cynthia Lecours, Marie-Kim St-Pierre, Maude Bordeleau, Helene Roumes, Véronique De Smedt-Peyrusse, Alexandran Séré, Leslie Schwendimann, Stephane Grégoire, Lionel Bretillon, Niyazi Acar, Corinne Joffre, Guillaume Ferreira, Raluca Uricaru, Patricia Thebault, Pierre Gressens, Marie-Eve Tremblay, Sophie Layé, Agnes Nadjar Volume 70Issue 1Glia pages: 50-70 First Published online: September 14, 2021

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGliaSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207