Real‐world effectiveness of repeated ketamine infusions for treatment‐resistant bipolar depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Clinical trials have demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects with intravenous (IV) ketamine for major depressive disorder, with relatively less research specifically for bipolar depression. Herein, we describe the real‐world effectiveness of repeated ketamine infusions for treatment‐resistant bipolar depression. Methods This study was conducted in a community clinic in Mississauga, Ontario (Canadian Rapid Treatment Centre of Excellence; Braxia Health). In this observational study (NCT04209296), patients with treatment‐resistant bipolar I/II depression ( n = 66) received four sub‐anesthetic doses of IV ketamine (0.5–0.75 mg/kg) over a two‐week period. Symptoms of depression, suicidality, anxiety, and functioning were assessed with validated self‐report measures. Results Statistically and clinically significant antidepressant effects were observed in the overall sample, as measured by the Quick Inventory for Depression Symptomatology‐Self Report‐16 (QIDS‐SR 16 ) with further reductions in depressive symptoms observed after each subsequent infusion ( n = 66; mean QIDS‐SR 16 reduction of 6.08+/−1.39; p < 0.0001). Significant reductions of suicidal thoughts (QIDS‐SR 16 ‐Suicide Item) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder‐7) were also observed with functional improvements on the Sheehan Disability Scale ( p < 0.0001 on all measures). Moreover, the response rate (QIDS‐SR 16 total score decrease ≥50% from baseline) was 35% and remission rate (QIDS‐SR 16 total score ≤5) was 20% after four infusions. Infusions were generally well tolerated with treatment‐emergent hypomania observed in only three patients (4.5%) with zero cases of mania or psychosis. Conclusions Real‐world effectiveness of IV ketamine for bipolar depression was observed. Repeated doses were associated with greater symptom reduction and adequate tolerability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".