Impact of meningeal and age‐related off‐target binding on longitudinal [<sup>18</sup>F]MK6240 quantification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background [18F]MK6240 tau‐PET can detect changes in the early and late stages of tau tangles accumulation. However, off‐target binding, often observed in the meninges and neuromelanin‐containing cells, can interfere with longitudinal tracer quantification. Here, we investigated the association of longitudinal changes in off‐target and target signals using [18F]MK6240. Method We assessed individuals from the TRIAD cohort with [18F]MK6240 tau‐PET and clinical evaluation. Longitudinal analyses included 83 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 37 cognitively impaired (CI) individuals. Age‐related off‐target binding was estimated comparing 36 CU young individuals (<25 y.o) and 28 CU elderly amyloid/tau negative (40‐65 y.o). A t‐test was used to compare both groups. The ratio between baseline and follow‐up SUVR measured changes in off‐target and target regions. Pearson correlations tested the associations between regions, and Bonferroni analysis corrected for multiple comparisons. Result Although averaged images did not present a striking visual difference in [18F]MK6240 uptake between CU young and elderlies, t‐test revealed significant differences between groups in the cerebellar white matter and subcortical regions (Figure 1). Table 1 depicts the percentage of area of selected regions overlapping with the age‐related off‐target binding. Notably, we did not observe a significant association between longitudinal changes in age‐related or meningeal off‐target binding with longitudinal change in target regions (Braak‐II, BraakIII‐IV, BraakV‐VI), whereas changes in target regions were highly correlated (Figure 2). Conclusion Despite not being visually perceptible, [18F]MK6240 presents age‐related off‐target binding in subcortical regions, similar to regions reported using [18F]Flortaupicir. The overlap between age‐related off‐target and Braak IV region (∼3%) may lead to the confounding results in quantifying this region. The lack of correlation between off‐target and target [18F]MK6240 changes suggests little influence of the off‐target binding on longitudinal tracer quantification. Our results suggest that although off‐target uptake appears to have a modest influence on longitudinal quantification, it is necessary to consider both age‐related and meningeal off‐target signals for an accurate tracer assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".