The role of IGFBP2 in pre‐symptomatic Alzheimer's disease: a multimodal longitudinal study of cognitively unaffected individuals with a family history of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Insulin‐like growth factors (IGF) play pivotal roles in neurogenesis, neuronal survival, synaptogenesis and compensatory repair mechanisms following injury. Insulin‐like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP) bind to IGFs, and regulate interactions between IGFs and their cell surface receptors. In the brain, IGFBP2 is the most abundant IGFBP. Several studies have observed altered IGFBP2 levels in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. However, the role of IGFBP2 during pre‐symptomatic AD remains unknown. Thus, we used longitudinal data acquired from the pre‐symptomatic PREVENT‐AD cohort to examine its possible contributions to AD pathophysiology. Method For initial cross‐sectional analyses, the Mini‐Mental State Examination was used to stage the participants (PREVENT‐AD, CCNA and Douglas cohorts) across the AD spectrum. Olink’s primer extension assay was used to measure cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) IGFBP2 levels. PREVENT‐AD participants were followed longitudinally for 6‐8 years. Annual visits included cognitive performance assessments, lumbar punctures and neuroimaging. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) evaluated five cognitive domains (immediate memory, delayed memory, attention, language and visuospatial abilities) and included a total summary score. Result CSF IGFBP2 levels were significantly reduced in MCI (p < 0.001) and AD participants (p = 0.027 and p < 0.001 respectively), relative to controls (Figure 1). In the PREVENT‐AD cohort, baseline CSF IGFBP2 levels were negatively correlated with RBANS cognitive performance trajectory slopes estimated over the course of 6 to 8 years, for the delayed memory (p = 0.003), visuospatial (p = 0.008) and total scale indices (p = 0.021) (Figure 2). However, baseline CSF IGFBP2 levels were not associated with cognitive decline for the immediate memory (p = 0.162), attention (p = 0.890) and language (p = 0.841) indices (Figure 3). Finally, in the PREVENT‐AD cohort, baseline CSF IGFBP2 levels were negatively correlated with baseline left entorhinal cortex volume (p = 0.011), but were not correlated with right entorhinal cortex volume (p = 0.868)(Figure 4). Conclusion Our results suggest that IGFBP2 may exhibit a bi‐directional association with AD stage pathology. Our findings revealed that IGFBP2 is strongly correlated with early cognitive decline in the delayed memory and visuospatial domains, in pre‐symptomatic individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".