MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Granzyme B inhibits translation of viral proteins and viral replication through proteolytic cleavage of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4 gamma 3 (154.35)

2011· article· en· W4313349871 on OpenAlexaff
Marcelo Marcet‐Palacios, Brenda Duggan, Irene Shostak, Michèle Barry, John Wilkins, Akiko Yanagiya, Nahum Sonenberg, R. Chris Bleackley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of ManitobaConcordia UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEIF4GCTL*BiologyViral replicationGranzyme BJurkat cellsVirologyCytotoxic T cellCell biologyVirusMolecular biologyTranslation (biology)T cellImmune systemMessenger RNAIn vitroBiochemistryImmunologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) are the major killer of virus-infected cells. Granzyme B (GrB) from CTL induces apoptosis in target cells by cleavage and activation of substrates such as caspase-3. However, while undergoing apoptosis, cells can still produce infectious viruses unless a mechanism exists to specifically inhibit viral production. Using proteomic approaches, we found a novel GrB target that plays a major role in protein synthesis: eukaryotic initiation factor 4 Gamma 3 (eIF4G3). We hypothesized a novel role for GrB to arrest translation of viral proteins by targeting eIF4G3, which contains the GrB recognition sequence IESD1408S. We showed that GrB specifically cleaves eIF4G3 since the mutant eIF4G-Δ, with Ala substituted for D1408, was resistant to GrB degradation. Translational inhibition by GrB was reversed by the inclusion of eIF4G-Δ, showing that eIF4G3 is the critical GrB substrate involved in translation. In Jurkat cells, GrB or CTL treatment resulted in reduced rate of translation. We infected Jurkat cells with vaccinia virus (VV) and showed that viral protein synthesis and viral replication was inhibited in response to GrB or CTL. Transfection of eIF4G-Δ reversed the halt in protein synthesis induced by GrB. This demonstrated for the first time that GrB could prevent the production of VV by targeting the translational machinery of the host. These results represent a major new insight into what constitutes an effective CTL response to a virus-infected cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→