MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313422585 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcac333

White-matter abnormalities in presymptomatic<i>GRN</i>and<i>C9orf72</i>mutation carriers

2022· article· en· W4313422585 on OpenAlexafffund
Hyunwoo Lee, Ian R. Mackenzie, Mirza Faisal Beg, Karteek Popuri, Rosa Rademakers, Dana Wittenberg, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of British Columbia
FundersPacific Alzheimer Research FoundationAlzheimer Society of B.C.National Institutes of HealthGenome British ColumbiaAlzheimer's SocietyCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlzheimer SocietyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsC9orf72Frontotemporal dementiaFractional anisotropyWhite matterDementiaDiffusion MRIMutationOncologyGeneticsPsychologyMedicinePathologyBiologyMagnetic resonance imagingDiseaseGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A large proportion of familial frontotemporal dementia is caused by TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 kDa) proteinopathies. Accordingly, carriers of autosomal dominant mutations in the genes associated with TAR DNA-binding protein 43 aggregation, such as Chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) or progranulin (GRN), are at risk of later developing frontotemporal dementia. Brain imaging abnormalities that develop before dementia onset in mutation carriers may serve as proxies for the presymptomatic stages of familial frontotemporal dementia due to a genetic cause. Our study objective was to investigate brain MRI-based white-matter changes in predementia participants carrying mutations in C9orf72 or GRN genes. We analysed mutation carriers and their family member controls (noncarriers) from the University of British Columbia familial frontotemporal dementia study. First, a total of 42 participants (8 GRN carriers; 11 C9orf72 carriers; 23 noncarriers) had longitudinal T1-weighted MRI over ∼2 years. White-matter signal hypointensities were segmented and volumes were calculated for each participant. General linear models were applied to compare the baseline burden and the annualized rate of accumulation of signal abnormalities among mutation carriers and noncarriers. Second, a total of 60 participants (9 GRN carriers; 17 C9orf72 carriers; 34 noncarriers) had cross-sectional diffusion tensor MRI available. For each participant, we calculated the average fractional anisotropy and mean, radial and axial diffusivity parameter values within the normal-appearing white-matter tissues. General linear models were applied to compare whether mutation carriers and noncarriers had different trends in diffusion tensor imaging parameter values as they neared the expected age of onset. Baseline volumes of white-matter signal abnormalities were not significantly different among mutation carriers and noncarriers. Longitudinally, GRN carriers had significantly higher annualized rates of accumulation (estimated mean: 15.87%/year) compared with C9orf72 carriers (3.69%/year) or noncarriers (2.64%/year). A significant relationship between diffusion tensor imaging parameter values and increasing expected age of onset was found in the periventricular normal-appearing white-matter region. Specifically, GRN carriers had a tendency of a faster increase of mean and radial diffusivity values and C9orf72 carriers had a tendency of a faster decline of fractional anisotropy values as they reached closer to the expected age of dementia onset. These findings suggest that white-matter changes may represent early markers of familial frontotemporal dementia due to genetic causes. However, GRN and C9orf72 mutation carriers may have different mechanisms leading to tissue abnormalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207