MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315778614 · doi:10.1101/2023.01.11.23284254

Garetosmab, an inhibitor of activin A, reduces heterotopic ossification and flare-ups in adults with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial

2023· preprint· en· W4315778614 on OpenAlexaff
Maja Di Rocco, Eduardo Forleo‐Neto, Robert J. Pignolo, Richard Keen, Philippe Orcel, Thomas Funck‐Brentano, Christian Roux, S. Kolta, Annalisa Madeo, Judith Bubbear, Jacek Tabarkiewicz, Małgorzata Szczepanek, Javier Bachiller‐Corral, Angela M. Cheung, Kathryn Dahir, Esmée Botman, Pieter G. Raijmakers, Mona Al Mukaddam, Lianne Tile, Cynthia Portal‐Celhay, Neena Sarkar, Peijie Hou, Bret J. Musser, Anita Boyapati, Kusha Mohammadi, Scott Mellis, A. J. Rankin, Aris N. Economides, Dinko González Trotter, Gary Herman, Sarah J. O’Meara, Richard DelGizzi, David M. Weinreich, George D. Yancopolous, Elisabeth M. W. Eekhoff, Frederick S. Kaplan

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersRegeneron PharmaceuticalsUniversity of PennsylvaniaVanderbilt University Medical CenterVanderbilt University
KeywordsFibrodysplasia ossificans progressivaPlaceboMedicineClinical endpointTolerabilityAdverse effectHeterotopic ossificationInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialSurgeryUrologyGastroenterologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), an ultra-rare disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding activin A receptor type 1 ( ACVR1) , is characterized by painful flare-ups and cumulative heterotopic ossification (HO). Garetosmab, a fully-human monoclonal antibody blocking activin A, prevents HO in FOP mice. Methods LUMINA-1 ( NCT03188666 ) was a phase 2, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and effects on HO of intravenous (IV) garetosmab 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W). Adult patients with FOP were randomized to garetosmab or placebo for 28 weeks (Period_1), followed by an open-label period (Period_2). After Period_2, patients were allowed to stay on garetosmab in an open-label extension. For Period_1, primary endpoints were HO total lesion activity (HO-TLA) by 18 F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography ( 18 F-NaF PET) and HO total lesion volume by computed tomography (CT). The Period_2 primary endpoint compared the number of new lesions in Period_2 versus Period_1. The safety primary endpoint was incidence and severity of TEAEs through the end of the Period 1 at week 28. Findings Patients (n=44) were randomized to garetosmab (n=20) or placebo (n=24). In Period_1, there was a trend for garetosmab to decrease HO-TLA versus placebo (24.6%; P =0.07), primarily driven by near complete prevention of new lesions (97% decrease by 18 F-NaF PET, post-hoc P =0.009; 90% relative reduction by CT, post-hoc P =0.017); flare-ups were significantly reduced ( P =0.0005). For placebo patients transitioning to garetosmab in Period_2, no patients developed new HO lesions (0% in Period_2 versus 40.9% in Period_1; P =0.0027) by CT. All 44 patients met primary safety endpoint of at least one TEAE during Period 1. Garetosmab was associated with more adverse events than placebo: mild recurrent epistaxis, madarosis, and skin/soft tissue infections. Overall, the AEs were predominantly mild in severity, with no effect on patients’ ability to receive garetosmab. Five deaths (5/44; 11.4%) occurred either in Period_2 or the open-label extension. The deaths were associated with baseline disease severity in some, preexisting comorbidities in others and occurred following 8-16 doses (median: 15) of garetosmab in the open label/follow-up periods. Interpretation Garetosmab reduced flare-ups and prevented new HO lesions in FOP patients. Although side effects were mild to moderate, there were a relatively high number of deaths for a small study; the deaths were not related to epistaxis and considered unlikely to be related to garetosmab. Funding Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicHeterotopic Ossification and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207