S753 Mirikizumab Significantly Improves Abdominal Pain in Patients With Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results From the Phase 3 LUCENT-1 Induction and LUCENT-2 Maintenance Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Abdominal pain (AP) is a frequent and burdensome symptom in patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1 Mirikizumab (miri; IL-23p19 inhibitor) demonstrated efficacy vs placebo (PBO) in adult pts with moderately-to-severely active UC in randomized, double-blind, phase 3 LUCENT-1 (induction/NCT03518086) and LUCENT-2 (maintenance/NCT03524092) studies.2.3 Here, we report the effect of miri vs PBO on AP. Methods: In the induction study, pts (N=1162) were randomized 3:1 to receive intravenous (IV) miri 300 mg or PBO every 4 weeks (Q4W). Pts who achieved clinical response with miri at W12 (N=544) of induction were re-randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous (SC) miri 200 mg or PBO Q4W through W40 in the maintenance study. Pts recorded “worst AP in the past 24 hours” each day using an 11-point AP Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 = no pain; 10 = worst possible pain) on an electronic diary. AP improvement (AP NRS score ≥30% improvement from baseline [BL] in pts with BL AP NRS ≥3) was evaluated. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to compare the proportion of pts achieving AP improvement with missing data imputed as nonresponse. Results: As early as W4 (miri 43.0% vs PBO 33.7%; risk difference [95% CI]: 9.7 [2.8–16.6], p=0.007) of the induction study, a significant reduction from BL of at least 30% in AP NRS score was observed in the miri-treated pts vs PBO through W12 (66.4% vs 49.2%; 17.4 [10.3–24.6], p< 0.001). In the maintenance study, a greater percentage of miri-treated pts maintained AP NRS improvement compared to PBO. The separation started at W16 (79.2% vs 69.2%; 9.0 [0.5–17.5], p=0.034) and sustained through W40 (76.2% vs 47.2%; 27.4 [18.3–36.4], p< 0.001; Figure). Conclusion: Miri provided early (W4) and sustained improvement (through W40) of AP compared with PBO in pts with moderately-to-severely active UC.Figure 1.: The proportion of patients with AP NRS ≥30% improvement at A. induction and B. maintenance in patients with Abdominal Pain NRS score ≥3 at induction baseline. *p<0.05; **p<0.001 vs. placebo Weekly measures were calculated by averaging data from daily diary entries of AP NRS for a 7-day period. Baseline value for both induction and maintenance was calculated from daily diary entries the week prior to W0 of induction. Abbreviations: AP NRS, Abdominal Pain Numeric Rating Scale; IV, intravenous; miri, mirikizumab; PBO, placebo; SC, subcutaneous
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".