MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S1189 Safety and Efficacy of Oral TLR8 Agonist, Selgantolimod, in Viremic Adult Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B

2022· article· en· W4316085111 on OpenAlexaff
Harry L.A. Janssen, Young‐Suk Lim, Hyung Joon Kim, Cheng‐Hao Tseng, Carla S. Coffin, Magdy Elkashab, Sang Hoon Ahn, Anh‐Hoa Nguyen, Diana Chen, Jeffrey J. Wallin, Susana Tan, Jenny C. Yang, Anuj Gaggar, Diana M. Brainard, Scott Fung, Yoon Jun Kim, Jia‐Horng Kao, Wan‐Long Chuang, Anna E. S. Brooks

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHBsAgInternal medicineHBeAgPlaceboGastroenterologyClinical endpointAdverse effectTenofovir alafenamideAgonistImmunologyRandomized controlled trialHepatitis B virusViral loadReceptorPathologyVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Selgantolimod (GS-9688, SLGN) is an oral, Toll-like receptor 8 agonist in clinical development for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Here we present the results through week 48 on the safety and efficacy of 24 weeks of SLGN treatment in viremic CHB patients. Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 2 study, viremic CHB patients were randomized (2:2:1) to SLGN 3 mg, 1.5 mg, and placebo (PBO) once a week for 24 weeks in combination with tenofovir alafenamide. Safety assessments included monitoring of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) and laboratory abnor-malities. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with ≥1 log10IU/ml decline in HBsAg levels from baseline at week 24. Exploratory end points include changes in pharmacodynamic (PD) markers (e.g. IL-12p40 and IL-1RA) and changes in peripheral T- cell, myeloid and NK-cell subsets. Results: 67 patients (39 HBeAg-positive) were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups: majority were Asian (98.5%), male (58%) with a median (IQR) age of 47 (35–54) years, HBsAg level of 4.1 (3.5–4.7) log10IU/ml, and HBV DNA level of 7.5 (5.4–8.3) log10IU/ml. No patients achieved the primary end point of ≥1 log10IU/ml decline in HBsAg levels at week 24; however, 3 (6%) patients in the SLGN-treated achieved HBsAg decline ≥0.5 log10IU/ml compared to none in the placebo group. At week 48, 4 (7.4%) patients in the SLGN-treated group (including the 3 subjects at week 24) while none in the placebo group achieved HBsAg decline ≥0.5 log10IU/ml. Most frequent (≥10% SLGN-treated) TEAE (SLGN v PBO) were: nausea (26% v 0%), headache (15% v 15%), vomiting (17% v 0%), fatigue (15% v 0), and dizziness (11% v 0%). Grade ≥3 TEAE were observed in 0 (SLGN) v 7.7% (PBO) subjects; 1 subject (SLGN 3 mg) discontinued study due to TEAE of vomiting and abdominal pain. Most patients treated with SLGN showed decline of immune cell subsets in the circulation 4 h after dosing, concurrent with increases of circulating IL-12p40 and IL-1RA. Cell populations that decreased in the circulation included effector and memory T cell subsets. These parameters reverted to baseline values at 24 h post-dosing. Conclusion: Oral SLGN up to 3 mg once weekly for 24 weeks is safe and well-tolerated. SLGN can induce sustained HBsAg declines of ≥0.5 log10IU/ml in some patients out to Week 48. Further evaluation of SLGN in combination with immunomodulatory and antiviral agents is planned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicHepatitis B Virus Studies→French-language works237,207→