Scientific production about calgary model for evaluation of the family: a bibliometric study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Caracterizar a produção científica disponibilizada em periódicos online sobre o Modelo Calgary de Avaliação da Família. Métodos: Pesquisa bibliométrica cuja amostra correspondeu 52 artigos publicados entre 2004 e 2013 em periódicos de enfermagem, nas bases de dados LILACS, BDENF e na Biblioteca Digital SciELO. Dados coletados de março a abril de 2014. Resultados: Os dados evidenciaram que em 2009 teve o maior quantitativo de trabalhos (15.38%). Os periódicos com maior número de publicações foram a Revista de Pesquisa: Cuidado é Fundamental e a Revista da Escola Anna Nery Revista de Enfermagem. O maior quântico dos artigos obtiveram Qualis B2 e B1, com destaque para base de dados LILACS. Quanto à modalidade das publicações predominaram estudos originais. Ressalta-se a titulação de mestre entre os pesquisadores dos estudos. Conclusão: Os resultados evidenciaram a produção científica investigada como uma temática de interesse e crescimento no campo da Enfermagem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.054 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.017 | 0.064 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".