Antifungal Drug Concentration Impacts the Spectrum of Adaptive Mutations in <i>Candida albicans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Invasive fungal infections are a leading global cause of human mortality. Only three major classes of antifungal drugs are widely used, and resistance to all three classes can arise rapidly. The most widely prescribed antifungal drug, fluconazole, disseminates rapidly and reaches a wide range of concentrations throughout the body. The impact of drug concentration on the spectrum and effect of mutations acquired during adaptation is not known for any fungal pathogen, and how the specific level of a given stress influences the distribution of beneficial mutations has been poorly explored in general. We evolved 144 lineages from three genetically distinct clinical isolates of Candida albicans to four concentrations of fluconazole (0, 1, 8, and 64 μg/ml) and performed comprehensive phenotypic and genomic comparisons of ancestral and evolved populations. Adaptation to different fluconazole concentrations resulted in distinct adaptive trajectories. In general, lineages evolved to drug concentrations close to their MIC50 (the level of drug that reduces growth by 50% in the ancestor) tended to rapidly evolve an increased MIC50 and acquired distinct segmental aneuploidies and copy number variations. By contrast, lineages evolved to drug concentrations above their ancestral MIC50 tended to acquire a different suite of mutational changes and increased in drug tolerance (the ability of a subpopulation of cells to grow slowly above their MIC50). This is the first evidence that different concentrations of drug can select for different genotypic and phenotypic outcomes in vitro and may explain observed in vivo drug response variation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".