MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318188920 · doi:10.1159/000529336

Epigenetic Mechanisms Governing Female and Male Germline Development in Mammals

2022· review· en· W4318188920 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Development · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGermlineReprogrammingEpigenomeEpigeneticsChromatinH3K4me3DNA methylationHistoneGeneticsSomatic cellGerm cellCell biologyGenePromoterGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: DNA methylation (DNAme) and histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs) play an integral role in the transcriptional regulation of specific sets of genes and retrotransposons. In turn, these chromatin marks are essential for cellular reprogramming, including during germline development. While DNAme is stably propagated in most somatic tissues, this epigenetic mark undergoes cycles of widespread erasure and re-establishment in the early embryo as well as in the germline. SUMMARY: De novo DNAme occurs at distinct developmental stages in male and female germ cells; before birth in prospermatogonia (PSG) and after birth in growing oocytes. Furthermore, while only ∼40% of the mouse genome is methylated in mature oocytes, ∼80% of the genome is methylated in mature sperm. Here, we review recent epigenome studies which reveal a complex interplay between histone PTMs and de novo DNAme in shaping the sexually dimorphic profiles of DNAme observed in mature gametes in the mouse, including in intergenic regions as well as at imprinted gametic differentially methylated regions (gDMRs). We discuss the dynamics and distribution of key histone PTMs in male and female germ cells, including H3K36me2/me3, H3K4me3, and H3K27me3, and the implications of positive and negative crosstalk between these PTMs and the DNAme machinery. Finally, we reflect on how the sex-specific epigenetic landscapes observed in the mouse germline impact transcriptional regulation in both the gametes and the early embryo. KEY MESSAGES: Investigation of the roles of chromatin modifying enzymes and the interplay between the chromatin marks that they deposit in germ cells has been facilitated by analyses of conventional or germline-specific knockout mice, combined with low-input genome-wide profiling methods that have been developed in recent years. While clearly informative, these findings generally reflect "snapshots" of chromatin states derived from analyses of cells analyzed in bulk at a specific period in development. Technological advances and novel experimental models will be required to further refine our understanding of the underlying mechanism and order of establishment of chromatin marks and the impact of sexually dimorphic epigenetic patterning on transcription and other nuclear processes in germ cells, the early embryo and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it