MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318475562 · doi:10.1364/boe.484092

Quantification of structural heterogeneity in H&E stained clear cell renal cell carcinoma using refractive index tomography

2023· article· en· W4318475562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Optics Express · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDigital Holography and Microscopy
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersCommercializations Promotion Agency for R and D OutcomesKorea Health Industry Development InstituteNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaMinistry of Health and WelfareNational Research Foundation
KeywordsClear cell renal cell carcinomaPathologyRenal cell carcinomaHistopathologyTomographyMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a common histopathological subtype of renal cancer and is notorious for its poor prognosis. Its accurate diagnosis by histopathology, which relies on manual microscopic inspection of stained slides, is challenging. Here, we present a correlative approach to utilize stained images and refractive index (RI) tomography and demonstrate quantitative assessments of the structural heterogeneities of ccRCC slides obtained from human patients. Machine-learning-assisted segmentation of nuclei and cytoplasm enabled the quantification at the subcellular level. Compared to benign regions, malignant regions exhibited a considerable increase in structural heterogeneities. The results demonstrate that RI tomography provides quantitative information in synergy with stained images on the structural heterogeneities in ccRCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it