Instability of extrachromosomal DNA transformed into the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phaeodactylum tricornutum has been highly studied for its potential as a platform for metabolic engineering. While the possible applications of extrachromosomal expression via an episome have been investigated, there is still a lack of information concerning its efficacy and limitations. Therefore, we studied the episome expression system in P. tricornutum, aiming to elucidate its limitations regarding heterologous protein production and episome rearrangement events. Our objectives were to screen positive transconjugants by fluorescent signal indicating as a proxy for the production of the proteins of interest that could be used for vanillin synthesis, and to characterize the transconjugants by flow cytometry and whole plasmid sequencing. We designed an episome harboring an expression cassette that consisted of the enhanced green-fluorescent-protein (eGFP) linked by Thosea asigna virus 2A self-cleaving peptide (T2A) to a fusion protein of enoyl-CoA hydratase/aldolase (ech) and feruloyl-CoA synthetase (fcs), both from Streptomyces sp. strain V-1. This construction resulted in a percentage of fluorescent transconjugants lower than 10 % and it presented rearranged episomes in the fluorescent and the non-fluorescent transconjugants. The replacement of the fusion protein ech-fcs in the expression cassette with the fluorescent protein mCherry increased the percentage of eGFP fluorescent transconjugants over 80 % suggesting a toxicity of the ech-fcs gene expression and in turn forcing selection for rearranged episomes. A comparison of flow cytometry results and sequencing analysis demonstrated that a successful transformation with an unaltered expression cassette could lead to diatoms that do not produce the protein. On the other hand, transconjugants with mutations or rearrangements in the genes encoding the fusion ech-fcs protein led to fluorescent signal detection. Here, we show that using fluorescent reporters can mislead the selection of positive transconjugants by not being able to identify rearrangements in the genes of interest, and intact cassettes can lack fluorescent signal due to lack of heterologous protein production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".