Generation of Conditional Knockout Alleles for PRUNE-1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PRUNE1 is a member of the aspartic acid-histidine-histidine (DHH) protein superfamily, which could display an exopolyphosphatase activity and interact with multiple cellular proteins involved in the cytoskeletal rearrangement. It is widely expressed during embryonic development and is essential for embryogenesis. PRUNE1 could also be critical for postnatal development of the nervous system as it was found to be mutated in patients with microcephaly, brain malformations, and neurodegeneration. To determine the cellular function of PRUNE1 during development and in disease, we have generated conditional mouse alleles of the Prune1 in which loxP sites flank exon 6. Crossing these alleles with a ubiquitous Cre transgenic line resulted in a complete loss of PRUNE1 expression and embryonic defects identical to those previously described for Prune1 null embryos. In addition, breeding these alleles with a Purkinje cell-specific Cre line (Pcp2-Cre) resulted in the loss of Purkinje cells similar to that observed in patients carrying a mutation with loss of PRUNE1 function. Therefore, the Prune1 conditional mouse alleles generated in this study provide important genetic tools not only for dissecting the spatial and temporal roles of PRUNE1 during development but also for understanding the pathogenic role of PRUNE1 dysfunction in neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental disease. In addition, from this work, we have described an approach that allows one to efficiently generate conditional mouse alleles based on mouse zygote electroporation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".