MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319460783 · doi:10.17269/s41997-023-00742-z

How to carry out participatory research that takes account of sex and gender issues: a scoping review of guidelines targeting health inequities

2023· review· en· W4319460783 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Mélanie Lefrançois, Hélène Sultan‐Taïeb, Jena Webb, Mathieu-Joël Gervais, Karen Messing, Vanessa Blanchette-Luong, Jessica Riel, Johanne Saint-Charles, Rachel Faust, Cathy Vaillancourt, Myriam Fillion, Marie Laberge

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Public Health · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité TÉLUQInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitute of Gender and HealthUniversité de MontréalSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et CultureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsEmpowermentPublic relationsContext (archaeology)ReflexivityStakeholderParticipatory action researchCitizen journalismIntersectionalityGrey literaturePublic healthSociologyPolitical sciencePsychologyMedicineMEDLINESocial scienceNursingGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.244
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.344
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2440.344
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.008
Bibliometrics0.0140.012
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0150.018
Open science0.0060.009
Research integrity0.0100.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.889
GPT teacher head0.614
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
DomainMethods
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Public HealthSame topicSex and Gender in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207