Negligible role of TRAIL death receptors in cell death upon endoplasmic reticulum stress in B-cell malignancies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impairments in protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lead to a condition called ER stress, which can trigger apoptosis via the mitochondrial or the death receptor (extrinsic) pathway. There is controversy concerning involvement of the death receptor (DR)4 and DR5-Caspase-8 -Bid pathway in ER stress-mediated cell death, and this axis has not been fully studied in B-cell malignancies. Using three B-cell lines from Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and Multiple Myeloma origins, we engineered a set of CRISPR KOs of key components of these cell death pathways to address this controversy. We demonstrate that DR4 and/or DR5 are essential for killing via TRAIL, however, they were dispensable for ER-stress induced-cell death, by Thapsigargin, Brefeldin A or Bortezomib, as were Caspase-8 and Bid. In contrast, the deficiency of Bax and Bak fully protected from ER stressors. Caspase-8 and Bid were cleaved upon ER-stress stimulation, but this was DR4/5 independent and rather a result of mitochondrial-induced feedback loop subsequent to Bax/Bak activation. Finally, combined activation of the ER-stress and TRAIL cell-death pathways was synergistic with putative clinical relevance for B-cell malignancies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".