Persistent hematopoietic polyclonality after lentivirus-mediated gene therapy for Fabry disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The safety and efficacy of lentivirus-mediated gene therapy was recently demonstrated in five male patients with Fabry disease—a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA gene mutations that result in multiple end-organ complications. To evaluate the risks of clonal dominance and leukemogenesis, which have been reported in multiple gene therapy trials, we conducted a comprehensive DNA insertion site analysis of peripheral blood samples from the five patients in our gene therapy trial. We found that patients had a polyclonal integration site spectrum and did not find evidence of a dominant clone in any patient. Although we identified vector integrations near proto-oncogenes, these had low percentages of contributions to the overall pool of integrations and did not persist over time. Overall, we show that our trial of lentivirus-mediated gene therapy for Fabry disease did not lead to hematopoietic clonal dominance and likely did not elevate the risk of leukemogenic transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it