MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321460838 · doi:10.37941/pb/2023/1

World-class universities? Interrogating the biases and coloniality of global university rankings

2023· report· en· W4321460838 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tiffany Nassiri-Ansari, David McCoy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, San FranciscoWestern Sydney UniversityUppsala UniversitetSyddansk UniversitetUniversità di BolognaUniversity of TokyoKaohsiung Medical UniversityMahidol UniversityEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichDalhousie UniversityChulalongkorn UniversityAalborg UniversitetTechnische Universiteit DelftEdith Cowan UniversityArizona State UniversityGriffith UniversityRMIT UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillHarvard UniversityUniversity of WollongongMonash UniversityUniversity College CorkLa Trobe UniversitySemmelweis EgyetemDeakin UniversityUniversity of BristolRoyal College of Surgeons in IrelandAustralian Catholic UniversityJames Cook UniversityCardiff UniversityUniversidade de CoimbraQueen's UniversityUniversity of EdinburghUniversity of LeedsUniversity of LeicesterIran University of Medical SciencesUniversity of OtagoErasmus Universiteit RotterdamPrinceton UniversityUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of California, San DiegoJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of TorontoImperial College LondonCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversiteit UtrechtAarhus UniversitetUniversity of MelbourneNewcastle UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaLunds UniversitetUniversity of SydneyUniversity College DublinUniversity of Southern CaliforniaPurdue UniversityUniversity College LondonKarolinska InstitutetYale UniversityUniversity of QueenslandEmory UniversityMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyMcMaster UniversityUniversity of OxfordUniversitat de BarcelonaKing's College LondonUniversity of New South WalesUniversity of Glasgow
KeywordsClass (philosophy)World classMathematics educationSociologyPolitical sciencePsychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This briefing paper describes and critically appraises two of the most prominent global university ranking systems: the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings, and the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). It also describes the only subject-specific ranking system for the discipline of public health as well as two new initiatives aimed at ranking universities according to their performance in contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207