MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323353115 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.060

A60 DOWN WITH THE SHP-1: CHRONIC HELMINTH INFECTION DISRUPTS BILE ACID HOMEOSTASIS AND SIGNALLING RECEPTOR ACTIVATION IN THE MURINE SMALL INTESTINE TO POTENTIALLY IMPACT GUT IMMUNITY

2023· article· en· W4323353115 on OpenAlexaff
James Lane, Tara P. Brosschot, Lisa A. Reynolds

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmall intestineBiologyFarnesoid X receptorHeligmosomoides polygyrusHomeostasisImmunologyReceptorImmune systemHelminthsImmunityCell biologyTranscription factorEndocrinologyNuclear receptorGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Helminths (parasitic worms) use immunomodulatory mechanisms to maintain their presence in the host intestines. Understanding how helminths reduce inflammation in the guts may lead to new therapeutic options for inflammatory bowel diseases. Our lab uses a helminth which infects the proximal small intestine of mice to identify new, potentially immunomodulatory molecules. In this project, we examined the impact of helminth infection on bile acids (BA)s; a class of metabolites that can function as immunomodulatory signalling molecules. To our knowledge, how helminth infection alters BA homeostasis, and the potential consequences for proximal small intestine immunity have not yet been reported. Purpose Our aims were to determine whether helminth infection alters (1) the intestinal BA pool, (2) expression of BA transporters in the small intestine, and (3) expression and/or activation of the Farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a BA signalling receptor. Method We used a murine model system to study the effects of the mouse-specific helminth Heligmosomoides polygyrus on BA homeostasis, BA transporter gene expression, and BA signalling receptors in the small intestine. Male and female littermate mice were used. Targeted metabolomics was used to assess the composition of the BA pool in the small intestine. Reverse transcription qPCR was used to quantify gene expression of BA transporters/signalling molecules in tissues. All data were segregated by sex of mice for data analysis. Result(s) We found that helminth infection disrupts the BA pool of mice, with consistent reductions in T-CDCA and T-αMCA during helminth infection. In the proximal small intestine, expression of the genes that encode the apical sodium dependant BA transporter (ASBT) and organic solute transporter alpha (OSTα) were unaffected during helminth infection, however expression of the organic solute transporter β (OSTβ) gene, which encodes half of the basal BA transporter, was decreased. Expression of Shp-1, an indicator of activation of BA receptor FXR, and expression of the Fxr gene were significantly decreased in both the proximal and distal small intestine. Lastly, expression of the gene encoding Gpbar1 trended upwards in the proximal and distal small intestine of female mice. Conclusion(s) Infection of mice with a proximal small intestine-dwelling helminth impacts BA homeostasis in the small intestine. Helminth infection decreases expression of a BA transporter in the proximal small intestine, although whether this contributes to or is caused by perturbations in the BA pool during infection remains to be seen. The downregulation of BA signalling we see during helminth infection in the proximal small intestine points to a potential functional impact on the host immune response which we now intend to explore. Understanding the immunomodulatory mechanisms used by helminths to dampen the host immune response could lead to further advancements in treating intestinal inflammatory disorders such as Crohn’s and Colitis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→