Content Validity of a Collaborative Goal-Setting Pictorial Tool for Children Who Wear Ankle-Foot Orthoses: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction To determine the optimum prescription and dosage for an ankle-foot orthosis and footwear, clinicians and families need to agree on goals for intervention. To facilitate family-centered collaborative goal setting, a table of potential goals and its pictorial representation had been developed previously. These tools incorporated the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) clinical objectives for orthoses and were structured in an approach understandable to families. This study aimed to obtain consensus on the content validity of the Table and Pictorial Tools. Methods Seventeen experts from seven countries (orthotists, physical therapists, physicians, surgeons, and engineers) were invited. A modified Delphi technique was used to evaluate and refine the Table Tool (rounds 1 and 2) and Pictorial Tool (rounds 3 and 4). Participants rated their agreement with overall tool structure, content, and feasibility of use on a 4-point Likert scale, and provided open-ended feedback. Consensus was defined as a median score ≥3 (agree) with 75% of responses ≥3. Data were collected using REDCap. After each round, thematic analysis guided document revisions and anonymized feedback. Results Ten experts from four countries completed the study. Round 1 (Table Tool): median ratings were all 3; consensus was achieved for 3/5 questions. Round 2: full consensus was achieved. Round 3 (Pictorial Tool): median ratings were ≥3 for 10/11 questions; consensus was achieved for 4/11 questions. Round 4: full consensus was achieved. Conclusions The content validity for the Table and Pictorial Tools was established by modified Delphi consensus. These tools represent a comprehensive selection of goals across all ICF components. Clinical Relevance These novel tools have the potential to facilitate collaborative goal setting between families and clinicians and aid clinical education. A goal-setting framework specific to orthotic management may improve outcomes within the context of family-centered care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".