MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy for patients (pts) with high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR NMIBC) unresponsive to bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG): Results from cohort B of the phase 2 KEYNOTE-057 trial.

2023· article· en· W4324136951 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Necchi, M. Roumiguié, Adil Esen, Thierry Lebrét, Ronald de Wit, Neal D. Shore, Dean F. Bajorin, Laurence E. Krieger, Shuya Kandori, Edward Uchio, Ho Kyung Seo, Joost L. Boormans, Ashish M. Kamat, Eric A. Singer, Petros Grivas, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Kijoeng Nam, Ekta Kapadia, Margot Van den Sigtenhorst-Fijlstra, Girish S. Kulkarni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortBladder cancerCystectomyPembrolizumabInternal medicineOncologyCancerMetastasisUrologySurgeryImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LBA442 Background: Although most pts with HR NMIBC respond to BCG, pts whose cancer does not respond or who relapse within 12 mo have poor prognosis and require radical cystectomy (RC). The single-arm, multicohort phase 2 KEYNOTE-057 trial (NCT02625961) was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of pembro monotherapy for pts with BCG-unresponsive HR NMIBC (per FDA) who were ineligible or declined to undergo RC. Results from cohort A (carcinoma in situ [CIS] ± papillary tumors) showed a clinical complete response rate of 41% at 3 mo and led to approval of pembro monotherapy for such pts in the United States. We describe the results from cohort B (papillary tumors without CIS). Methods: Pts were aged ≥18 y with BCG-unresponsive HR NMIBC with papillary tumors only (high-grade Ta or any-grade T1) at baseline and ECOG PS 0-2. Pts received pembro 200 mg every 3 wk (Q3W) for ≤35 cycles (~2 y). Cancer was assessed at 12 wk and Q12W thereafter if no recurrent HR NMIBC or progression was observed; CT urography was done Q24W. Primary end points for cohort B were 12-mo disease-free survival (DFS) rate of HR NMIBC as assessed by central pathology/radiology review and safety, assuming a 12-mo DFS of >20% for HR NMIBC. Secondary efficacy end points were 12-mo DFS rate of any disease; progression-free survival (PFS) to worsening of grade, stage, or death; PFS to muscle invasion, metastasis, or death; and overall survival (OS). Results: Overall, 132 pts received pembro for a median of 9.5 cycles (range, 1.0-35.0). Median age was 72 y (range, 37-87); 57 pts (43.2%) had T1 stage; all pts (100%) had urothelial histology; 104 pts (78.8%) were male; pts received a median of 10 (range, 6-33) prior BCG instillations. Median follow-up was 45.4 mo (range, 14.9-77.1). Efficacy data are shown in Table. Thirty-one pts (23.5%) had RC after stopping pembro. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 97 pts (73.5%); 19 (14.4%) had a grade 3/4 treatment-related AE and 14 pts (10.6%) discontinued due to a treatment-related AE. No deaths from treatment-related AEs occurred. Conclusions: Pembro showed notable antitumor activity in pts with BCG-unresponsive non-CIS papillary HR NMIBC after ~45 mo of follow-up. Toxicity was manageable and consistent with that in cohort A, with no new safety signals. Results suggest pts with non-CIS papillary HR NMIBC unresponsive to BCG who declined or were ineligible to undergo RC may also benefit from pembro monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02625961 . [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→