MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4327933168 · doi:10.1055/s-0042-1760504

Emicizumab prophylaxis for the treatment of people with moderate or mild Hemophilia A without Factor VIII inhibitors: results from the primary analysis of the HAVEN 6 study

2023· article· en· W4327933168 on OpenAlexaff
Johannes Oldenburg, Cédric Hermans, C Negrier, Michaela Lehle, Pratima Chowdary, Olivier Catalani, Víctor Jiménez‐Yuste, Christophe Schmitt, Giuliana Ventriglia, Jerzy Windyga, Anna Kiialainen, R. d'Oiron, Paul Moorehead, S Koparkar, Vanda Teodoro, D A Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenueHämostaseologie · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBispecific antibodyMonoclonal antibodyAntibodyInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that substitutes for missing activated factor (F)VIII in people with hemophilia A (HA). This primary analysis ofHAVEN 6 (NCT04158648) aims to assess safety and efficacy of emicizumab prophylaxis in people with non-severe HA without FVIII inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHämostaseologieSame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207