Hidden Genetic Regulation of Human Complex Traits via Brain Isoforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alternative splicing exists in most multi-exonic genes, and exploring these complex alternative splicing events and their resultant isoform expressions is essential. However, it has become conventional that RNA sequencing results have often been summarized into gene-level expression counts mainly due to the multiple ambiguous mapping of reads at highly similar regions. Transcript-level quantification and interpretation are often overlooked, and biological interpretations are often deduced based on combined transcript information at the gene level. Here, for the most variable tissue of alternative splicing, the brain, we estimate isoform expressions in 1,191 samples collected by the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Consortium using a powerful method that we previously developed. We perform genome-wide association scans on the isoform ratios per gene and identify isoform-ratio quantitative trait loci (irQTL), which could not be detected by studying gene-level expressions alone. By analyzing the genetic architecture of the irQTL, we show that isoform ratios regulate educational attainment via multiple tissues including the frontal cortex (BA9), cortex, cervical spinal cord, and hippocampus. These tissues are also associated with different neuro-related traits, including Alzheimer's or dementia, mood swings, sleep duration, alcohol intake, intelligence, anxiety or depression, etc. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis revealed 1,139 pairs of isoforms and neuro-related traits with plausible causal relationships, showing much stronger causal effects than on general diseases measured in the UK Biobank (UKB). Our results highlight essential transcript-level biomarkers in the human brain for neuro-related complex traits and diseases, which could be missed by merely investigating overall gene expressions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43657-023-00100-6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".