Characterization of styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS)-modified asphalt binders using the bending beam rheometer and the asphalt binder cracking device
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The addition of styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) to asphalt binders has led to enhanced performance in pavements across the entire range of working temperatures. SBS-modified binders have also proven to be more difficult to characterize in terms of their rheological properties. Low-temperature properties of asphalt binders are typically evaluated using the bending beam rheometer (BBR), which was developed to measure creep stiffness. Recent refinements to the BBR analysis have led to the development of Δ T c which is meant to provide more insight into the relaxation properties of the binder. The Asphalt Binder Cracking Device (ABCD) was developed to improve on this characterization by also taking into consideration the failure strength and coefficient of thermal contraction. Previous research has shown that the ABCD provides more valuable insight into the effect of SBS on the low-temperature properties of asphalt binders. This paper will evaluate the ability of these two low-temperature tests to characterize the performance of five different asphalt binders with increasing concentrations of SBS. It was found that the evaluation of the materials using Δ T c was inconsistent with binder type and generally indicated that SBS reduced cracking resistance, while the ABCD critical temperature and the proposed Δ T f parameter generally showed an improved correlation with SBS concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".