MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362544049 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-3677

Abstract 3677: DNA damage signaling activates <i>de novo</i> GTP synthesis to promote chemoradiation resistance in glioblastoma

2023· article· en· W4362544049 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew J. Scott, Alexandra M. O’Brien, Weihua Zhou, Vidhi Pareek, Zhou Sha, Sravya Palavalasa, Ayesha U. Kothari, Kari Wilder-Romans, Li Zhang, Anthony Andren, Sriram Chandrasekaran, Jason Heth, Yoshie Umemura, Nathan Qi, John Woulfe, Sriram Venneti, Meredith A. Morgan, Theodore S. Lawrence, Wajd N. Al‐Holou, Costas A. Lyssiotis, Daniel Wahl

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurineDNA damageNucleotide salvageCancer researchDNA repairDNA synthesisIn vivoBiologyIn vitroPurine metabolismGuanineBiochemistryDNAChemistryEnzymeNucleotideGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is uniformly fatal due to inherent radiation (RT) and chemotherapy resistance. We have found this therapeutic resistance is mediated by alterations in tumor cellular metabolic activity. Our group and others have found that metabolites can regulate DNA repair and RT resistance in brain tumors, but little is known about how DNA damage regulates metabolic pathway activity in cancer. Here, we show that DNA damage acutely increases guanine-containing purine metabolites in multiple in vitro and intracranial GBM models. By interrogating metabolic fluxes in vitro using a variety of stable isotope tracers, we confirmed RT-induced elevation in guanylates was due to increased de novo purine synthesis (DNPS) rather than activation of purine salvage. By developing and using novel stable isotope tracing methods to directly measure DNPS in awake, unrestrained mice, we confirmed that orthotopic GBMs have higher DNPS rates than adjacent cortical tissue that further increase after treatment with RT. Neither salvage synthesis of purines nor pyrimidine synthesis were impacted by RT in any intracranial tissues. With these findings, we opened a clinical study to directly measure purine synthesis in patients, and we found that human GBMs have similarly high purine synthesis rates compared to normal brain tissue. Because DNA damage activated DNPS without affecting purine salvage or pyrimidine synthesis, we reasoned that active signaling may be involved. Indeed, therapy-induced DNPS increases are lost in vitro and in vivo upon pharmacological or genomic inhibition of the DNA-damage sensing kinase DNA-PK. Moreover, RT and DNA-PK have direct influence over the spatial organization of DNPS enzymes, including IMPDH, the rate-limiting step in guanylate synthesis. Because purines can promote DNA repair, these findings suggest that DNA-PK signaling helps promote DNA repair in part by causing the spatial reorganization of DNPS enzymes, thereby activating purine synthesis. To determine if disrupting this regulation can augment GBM treatment efficacy, we combined an FDA-approved inhibitor of purine synthesis with chemoradiation in a variety of mouse models of GBM. Critically, targeting GTP synthesis improved the efficacy of both RT alone and chemoradiation in multiple patient-derived and syngeneic intracranial models, suggesting a potential therapeutic targeting opportunity in patients. In this study, we have developed novel methodology to directly measure purine synthesis in brain tumors in mice and humans. With these tools, we discovered that after DNA damage, DNA-PK mediates a novel pathway controlling the spatial reorganization of purine synthesis enzymes and subsequent DNPS increases. The resulting elevation of GTP levels promotes therapy resistance in tumors, and we are now directly measuring and inhibiting this molecular activity in patients with GBM in an effort to improve standard therapy. Citation Format: Andrew J. Scott, Alexandra M. O'Brien, Weihua Zhou, Vidhi Pareek, Zhou Sha, Sravya Palavalasa, Ayesha U. Kothari, Kari Wilder-Romans, Li Zhang, Anthony C. Andren, Sriram Chandrasekaran, Jason Heth, Yoshie Umemura, Nathan Qi, John Woulfe, Sriram Venneti, Meredith A. Morgan, Theodore S. Lawrence, Wajd N. Al-Holou, Costas A. Lyssiotis, Daniel R. Wahl. DNA damage signaling activates de novo GTP synthesis to promote chemoradiation resistance in glioblastoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3677.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207