MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of an international glossary for clinical guidelines collaboration

2023· review· en· W4362584841 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel E. Christensen, Michael D. Yi, Bianca Y. Kang, Sarah A. Ibrahim, Noor Anvery, McKenzie A. Dirr, Stephanie Adams, Yasser Sami Amer, Alexandre Bisdorff, Lisa Bradfield, Steven R. Brown, Amy Earley, Lisa A. Fatheree, P. Fayoux, Thomas S.D. Getchius, Pamela Ginex, Amanda Graham, Courtney R. Green, Paolo Gresele, Helen Hanson, Norrisa Haynes, László Hegedüs, Heba Hussein, Priya Jakhmola, Lucia Kantorová, Rathika Krishnasamy, Alex H. Krist, Gregory J. Landry, Erika D. Lease, L. Ley, Gemma Marsden, T. Meek, Martin Meremikwu, Carmen Moga, Saphia Mokrane, Amol Mujoomdar, Skye Newton, Norma O’Flynn, Gavin D. Perkins, Emma‐Jane Smith, Chatura Prematunge, Jenna Rychert, Mindy Saraco, Holger J. Schünemann, Emily Senerth, Alan J. Sinclair, James Shwayder, Carla Stec, Suzana Érico Tanni, Nichole Taske, Robyn Temple‐Smolkin, E. Louise Thomas, Sherene M. Thomas, Britt H. Tonnessen, Amy S. Turner, Anne Van Dam, Mitchell van Doormaal, Yung Liang Wan, Christina B. Ventura, Emma McFarlane, Rebecca L. Morgan, Toju Ogunremi, Murad Alam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Thoracic SocietyInstitute of Health EconomicsWestern UniversityImpactThe Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of CanadaPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlossaryMEDLINELibrary scienceMedicineFamily medicineMedical educationPolitical scienceComputer scienceLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.107
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.236
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1070.236
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.007
Bibliometrics0.0350.026
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0170.014
Open science0.0060.017
Research integrity0.0130.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.934
GPT teacher head0.780
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical EpidemiologySame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207