MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4364365415 · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2023.1103189

Preliminary evidence for developing safe and efficient fecal microbiota transplantation as potential treatment for aged related cognitive impairments

2023· article· en· W4364365415 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaoxia Chen, Wanling Zhang, Zhijun Lin, Zheng Chunyan, Shu-Fang Chen, Haihong Zhou, Zhou Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
KeywordsFecal bacteriotherapyFecesCognitionTransplantationMedicineImmunologyIntensive care medicineBiologyMicrobiologyAntibioticsPsychiatryInternal medicineClostridium difficile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Recent studies have reported that gut microbiota is closely associated with cognitive fuction. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may be a potential treatment for cognitive impairment, but its efficacy in patients with cognitive impairment is unknown. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of FMT for cognitive impairment treatment. Methods: Five patients aged 54-80 years (three women) were enrolled in this single-arm clinical trial from July 2021 to May 2022. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment-B (MoCA-B), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and the cognitive section of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog) were assessed at days 0, 30, 60, 90, and 180. Additionally, stool and serum samples were obtained twice before FMT was administered and six months after the treatment. The structure of fecal microbiota was analyzed by 16S RNA gene sequencing. Serum samples were analyzed for metabolomics and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding proteins by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Safety was assessed based on adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory parameters during FMT and the follow-up period. Results: The MoCA, ADL, and ADAS-Cog scores of patients with mild cognitive impairment (patients C and E) after FMT were improved or maintained compared with those before transplantation. However, patients with severe cognitive impairment (patients A, B, and D) had no worsening of cognitive scores. Fecal microbiota analysis showed that FMT changed the structure of gut microbiota. The results of serum metabolomics analysis suggested that there were significant changes in the serum metabolomics of patients after FMT, with 7 up-regulated and 28 down-regulated metabolites. 3b,12a-dihydroxy-5a-cholanoic acid, 25-acetylvulgaroside, deoxycholic acid, 2(R)-hydroxydocosanoic acid, and P-anisic acid increased, while bilirubin and other metabolites decreased. KEFF pathway analysis indicated that the main metabolic pathways were bile secretion and choline metabolism in cancer. No adverse effects were reported throughout the study. Conclusions: In this pilot study, FMT could maintain and improve cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment by changing gut microbiota structure and affecting serum metabolomics. Fecal bacteria capsules were safe. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: CHiCTR2100043548.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Cellular and Infection MicrobiologySame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207