MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract LB313: EGFRvIII-targeted alpha therapy shows significant therapeutic efficacy as both a single-agent and in combination with standard of care against preclinical GBM models

2023· article· en· W4365511862 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Metcalf, Alexander F. Nielsen, Suma Prabhu, Nicole Robinson, Sarah Marinacci, Natalie Grinshtein, Brigitte L. Thériault, Anne Marcil, María Jaramillo, Traian Sulea, Ivan A. Lessard, María Moreno, Christopher P. Leamon, Eric Burak, John F. Valliant

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodistributionCancer researchMedicineIn vivoTargeted therapyRadiation therapySpect imagingBlood–brain barrierCancerNuclear medicineBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Targeted alpha therapy (TAT) is a rapidly advancing class of radiotherapeutics that can effectively deliver potent and local radiation to cancer cells while sparing the surrounding normal cells. TATs hold great promise for treatment-resistant tumors such as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) due to the extensive DNA damage and cell death induced by alpha particles. GBM is an aggressive and lethal primary adult brain tumor that is highly resistant to external beam radiation and chemotherapy. Herein, we present the preclinical evaluation of a novel TAT for treatment of GBM targeting the most common tumour-specific mutant, epidermal growth factor receptor variant 3 (EGFRvIII). Our EGFRvIII TAT consists of a humanized EGFRvIII monoclonal antibody, a proprietary bifunctional chelate, and the alpha-emitting radionuclide, actinium-225 (225Ac). In vivo biodistribution and efficacy of our EGFRvIII TAT was evaluated in two aggressive orthotopic EGFRvIII-expressing GBM patient-derived xenograft models (PDXs; G06 and G39) with varying degrees of blood-brain-tumor barrier (BBTB) permeability. Imaging biodistribution studies were performed using an [111In]-anti-EGFRvIII agent analogous to our [225Ac] therapeutic candidate. SPECT/BLT imaging 96 h after intravenous administration of the imaging agent revealed high tumor-specific uptake of 50.2 %ID/cc in G39 tumors with a disrupted BBTB, and 10.4% ID/cc in G06 tumors with a relatively intact BBTB. Normal brain showed very low uptake (1.6-2.1% ID/cc), and all other normal organs were <10 % ID/cc except for highly perfused organs such as heart and liver, indicating no significant off-target uptake. [225Ac]-anti-EGFRvIII single-dose and fractionated multi-dose efficacy studies were conducted in G06 and G39 orthotopic PDX models, respectively. Survival analysis showed a dose-dependent increase in survival in response to treatment with [225Ac]-anti-EGFRvIII therapy, with a greater than 3-fold increase in survival compared to vehicle controls at doses of 200-400 nCi. Furthermore, the survival benefit of the 400 nCi single-dose or fractionated equivalent dose groups were comparable, demonstrating that efficacy was dependent upon the total administered radioactivity dose. Finally, we show that combined treatment of [225Ac]-anti-EGFRvIII with the standard of care (SoC), external beam radiation plus temozolomide, resulted in a significant survival advantage (>1.7-fold) compared to TAT or SoC therapy alone. Collectively, these results demonstrate that [225Ac]-anti-EGFRvIII is a highly selective and potent therapeutic for GBM which holds great potential as both a single-agent and in combination with SoC. Citation Format: Julie Metcalf, Alexander Nielsen, Suma Prabhu, Nicole Robinson, Sarah Marinacci, Natalie Grinshtein, Brigitte L. Theriault, Anne Marcil, Maria L. Jaramillo, Traian Sulea, Ivan A. Lessard, Maria Moreno, Christopher P. Leamon, Eric Burak, John Valliant. EGFRvIII-targeted alpha therapy shows significant therapeutic efficacy as both a single-agent and in combination with standard of care against preclinical GBM models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB313.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207