MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366082737 · doi:10.1021/acsami.2c22381

Contact Guidance of Connective Tissue Fibroblasts on Submicrometer Anisotropic Topographical Cues Is Dependent on Tissue of Origin, β1 Integrins, and Tensin-1 Recruitment

2023· article· en· W4366082737 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah F. Brooks, Silvia Mittler, Douglas W. Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFibrillogenesisConnective tissueFibronectinIntegrinNanotopographyVinculinExtracellular matrixCell biologyType I collagenCell adhesionAdhesionBiophysicsDermal fibroblastMaterials scienceCellFibroblastCell cultureBiologyBiochemistryFibrilGeneticsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The substratum topography of both natural and synthetic materials is a prominent regulator of cell behaviors including adhesion, migration, matrix fibrillogenesis, and cell phenotype. Connective tissue fibroblasts are known to respond to repeating groove topographical modifications by aligning and exhibiting directed migration, a phenomenon termed contact guidance. Although both reside in collagen rich connective tissues, dermal and gingival fibroblasts are known to exhibit differences in phenotype during wound healing, with gingival tissue showing a fetal-like scarless response. Differences in adhesion formation and maturation are known to underlie both a scarring phenotype and cell response to topographical features. Utilizing repeating groove substrates with periodicities of 600, 900, and 1200 nm (depth, 100 nm), we investigated the roles of integrins αvβ3 and β1 associated adhesions on contact guidance of human gingival (HGFs) and dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). HGFs showed a higher degree of orientation with the groove long axis than HDFs, with alignment of both vinculin and tensin-1 evident on 600 and 900 nm periodicities in both cell types. Orientation with grooves of any periodicity in HGFs and HDFs did not alter the adhesion number or area compared to smooth control surfaces. Growth of both cell types on all periodicities reduced fibronectin fibrillogenesis compared to control surfaces. Independent inhibition of integrin αvβ3 and β1 in both cell types induced changes in spreading up to 6 h and reduced alignment with the groove long axis. At 24 h post-seeding with blocking antibodies, HGFs recovered orientation, but in HDFs, blocking of β1, but not αvβ3 integrins, inhibited alignment. Blocking of β1 and αvβ3 in HDFs, but not HGFs, inhibited tensin-1-associated fibrillar adhesion formation. Furthermore, inhibition of β1 integrins in HDFs, but not HGFs, resulted in recruitment of tensin-1 to αvβ3 focal adhesions, preventing HDFs from aligning with the groove long axis. Our work demonstrates that tensin-1 localization with specific integrins in adhesion sites is an important determinant of contact guidance. This work emphasizes further the need for tissue-specific biomaterials, when integration into host tissues is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207