MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4366550103 · doi:10.1101/2023.04.19.537542

Tracking insulin- and glucagon-expressing bihormonal cells during differentiation using an <i>INSULIN</i> and <i>GLUCAGON</i> double reporter human embryonic stem cell line

2023· preprint· en· W4366550103 on OpenAlexafffund
Samantha Mar, Ekaterina Filatov, Cuilan Nian, Shugo Sasaki, Dahai Zhang, Francis C. Lynn

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCUniversity of AlbertaBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsGlucagonInsulinEmbryonic stem cellCell biologyBiologyGreen fluorescent proteinCell cultureStem cellBeta cellAlpha cellCellular differentiationReporter geneEnteroendocrine cellEndocrinologyInternal medicineHormoneGene expressionEndocrine systemIsletGeneMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived pancreatic alpha and beta cells can be used to develop cell replacement therapies to treat diabetes. However, recent published differentiation protocols yield varying amounts of alpha and beta cells amidst heterogeneous cell populations. To visualize and isolate hESC-derived alpha and beta cells, we generated a GLUCAGON-2A- mScarlet and INSULIN-2A-EGFP dual fluorescent reporter (INS EGFP GCG mScarlet ) hESC line using CRISPR/Cas9. We established robust expression of EGFP and mScarlet fluorescent proteins in insulin- and glucagon-expressing cells respectively without compromising the differentiation or function of these cells. We also showed the insulin- and glucagon-expressing bihormonal population at the maturing endocrine cell stage (Stage 6) lose insulin expression over time, while maintaining an alpha-like expression profile, suggesting these bihormonal cells are preferentially fated to become alpha-like cells in vitro . Together, the INS EGFP GCG mScarlet hESC line provides an efficient strategy for tracking populations of hESC-derived beta- and alpha-like cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPancreatic function and diabetes→French-language works237,207→