PENGARUH KOMITMEN ORGANISASI, MOTIVASI DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI KECAMATAN LENTENG KABUPATEN SUMENEP
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT
 
 The purpose of this study is to study whether organizational commitment, motivation, and good work coordination simultaneously influence significantly on the performance of employees of Lenteng Sub-District, Sumenep Regency, and to find out variables related to organizational commitment, motivation and significant partial cooperation with Lenteng District employee support. Sumenep Regency. This research was conducted at the Lenteng District Office in Sumenep Regency with a total sample of 34 people. The type of research used in this study is explanatory research (explanatory research). The main research used is quantitative and equipped with descriptive. The results of the study showed that simultaneously, organizational commitment, motivation and work discipline were significant towards the performance of employees of the Lenteng District of Sumenep Regency. Partially, organizational commitment, motivation and work discipline are significant to the performance of employees of the Lenteng District of Sumenep Regency. Motivation has a dominant and significant influence on the performance of employees of Lenteng District, Sumenep Regency.
 
 Keywords: organizational commitment, motivation, work discipline, employee performance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it