MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376954698 · doi:10.5194/bg-20-1773-2023

Sea–air methane flux estimates derived from marine surface observations and instantaneous atmospheric measurements in the northern Labrador Sea and Baffin Bay

2023· article· en· W4376954698 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Judith Vogt, David Risk, Évelise Bourlon, Kumiko Azetsu‐Scott, Evan Edinger, Owen A. Sherwood

Bibliographic record

VenueBiogeosciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyDalhousie UniversitySt. Francis Xavier UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité Laval
KeywordsBayWater columnOceanographyEnvironmental scienceArcticMethaneSurface waterAtmospheric methaneCurrent (fluid)SeawaterSubmarineFlux (metallurgy)Baseline (sea)Petroleum seepGeologyAtmospheric sciencesGreenhouse gas

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vast amounts of methane (CH 4 ) stored in submarine sediments are susceptible to release in a warming Arctic, further exacerbating climate change in a positive feedback. It is therefore critical to monitor CH 4 over pan-regional scales to detect early signs of CH 4 release. However, our ability to monitor CH 4 is hampered in remote northern regions by sampling and logistical constraints, and few good baseline data exist in many areas. From high-resolution atmospheric CH 4 measurements and discrete surface water samples, we estimated instantaneous sea–air CH 4 fluxes at various locations. We also created a baseline study of current background levels of CH 4 in North Atlantic waters based on the atmospheric CH 4 data over 22 d in summer 2021 on a roughly 5100 km voyage in the northern Labrador Sea and Baffin Bay between 55 and 72 ∘ N. In addition, we measured CH 4 concentrations across the water column at various stations. Measured atmospheric mixing ratios of CH 4 ranged from 1944 to 2012 ppbv, with a mean of 1966 ± 8 ppbv and a baseline of 1954–1981 ppbv. Dissolved CH 4 concentrations in the near-surface water peaked at 5.3 nmol L −1 within 1 km down-current of a known cold seep at Scott Inlet and were consistently oversaturated throughout the water column in Southwind Fjord, which is an area that has been recently affected by submarine landslides. Local sea–air CH 4 fluxes ranged from 0.003–0.119 µmol m −2 d −1 , indicating that the ocean released only small amounts of CH 4 to the atmosphere at all stations. Atmospheric CH 4 levels were also driven by meteorological, spatial, and temporal variations, and both onshore and ocean-based contributions to atmospheric CH 4 mixing ratios are likely. Coupled high-resolution measurements of marine and atmospheric CH 4 data have the potential to provide ongoing monitoring in a region susceptible to CH 4 releases, as well as critical validation data for global-scale measurements and modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiogeosciencesSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207