MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377103533 · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1093882

Genome-wide search identified DNA methylation sites that regulate the metabolome

2023· article· en· W4377103533 on OpenAlexafffund
Majid Nikpay

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Genetics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCompute Canada
KeywordsMetabolomeBiologyDNA methylationMethylationTranscriptomeCpG siteGeneticsMetabolomicsGeneComputational biologyBioinformaticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Identifying DNA methylation sites that regulate the metabolome is important for several purposes. In this study, publicly available GWAS data were integrated to find methylation sites that impact metabolome through a discovery and replication scheme and by using Mendelian randomization. Results: The outcome of analyses revealed 107 methylation sites associated with 84 metabolites at the genome-wide significance level ( p <5e −8 ) at both the discovery and replication stages. A large percentage of the observed associations (85%) were with lipids, significantly higher than expected ( p = 0.0003). A number of CpG (methylation) sites showed specificity e.g., cg20133200 within PFKP was associated with glucose only and cg10760299 within GATM impacted the level of creatinine; in contrast, there were sites associated with numerous metabolites e.g., cg20102877 on the 2p23.3 region was associated with 39 metabolites. Integrating transcriptome data enabled identifying genes (N = 82) mediating the impact of methylation sites on the metabolome and cardiometabolic traits. For example, PABPC4 mediated the impact of cg15123755-HDL on type-2 diabetes. KCNK7 mediated the impact of cg21033440-lipids on hypertension. POC5, ILRUN, FDFT1, and NEIL2 mediated the impact of CpG sites on obesity through metabolic pathways. Conclusion: This study provides a catalog of DNA methylation sites that regulate the metabolome for downstream applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in GeneticsSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207