MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378231868 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1128557

Prime editing strategies to mediate exon skipping in DMD gene

2023· article· en· W4378231868 on OpenAlexafffund
Cédric Happi Mbakam, Jeanne Roustant, Joël Rousseau, Pouiré Yaméogo, Yaoyao Lu, Anne Bigot, Kamel Mamchaoui, Vincent Mouly, Gabriel Lamothe, Jacques P. Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsExonTandem exon duplicationFrameshift mutationExon shufflingExon trappingExon skippingDuchenne muscular dystrophySplice site mutationMolecular biologyGeneticsBiologyspliceGeneMutationRNA splicingAlternative splicingRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare and lethal hereditary disease responsible for progressive muscle wasting due to mutations in the DMD gene. We used the CRISPR-Cas9 Prime editing technology to develop different strategies to correct frameshift mutations in DMD gene carrying the deletion of exon 52 or exons 45 to 52. With optimized epegRNAs, we were able to induce the specific substitution of the GT nucleotides of the splice donor site of exon 53 in up to 32% of HEK293T cells and 28% of patient myoblasts. We also achieved up to 44% and 29% deletion of the G nucleotide of the GT splice site of exon 53, as well as inserted 17% and 5.5% GGG between the GT splice donor site of exon 51 in HEK293T cells and human myoblasts, respectively. The modification of the splice donor site for exon 51 and exon 53 provoke their skipping and allowed exon 50 to connect to exon 53 and allowed exon 44 to connect to exon 54, respectively. These corrections restored the expression of dystrophin as demonstrated by western blot. Thus, Prime editing was used to induce specific substitutions, insertions and deletions in the splice donor sites for exons 51 and 53 to correct the frameshift mutations in DMD gene carrying deletions of exon 52 and exons 45 to 52, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MedicineSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207