Sex-Dimorphic Analyses Identify Novel and Sex-Specific Genetic Associations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sex is an integral variable often overlooked in complex disease genetics. Differences between sexes have been reported in natural history, disease complications, and age of onset in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While association studies have identified >230 IBD loci, there have been a limited number of studies investigating sex differences underlying these genetic associations. METHODS: We report the first investigation of sex-dimorphic associations via meta-analysis of a sex-stratified association study (34 579 IBD cases, 39 125 controls). In addition, we performed chromosome (chr) X-specific analyses, considering models of X inactivation (XCI) and XCI escape. Demographic and clinical characteristics were also compared between sexes. RESULTS: We identified significant differences between sexes for disease location and perianal complication in Crohn's disease and disease extent in ulcerative colitis. We observed genome-wide-significant sex-dimorphic associations (P < 5 × 10-8) at loci not previously reported in large-scale IBD genetic studies, including at chr9q22, CARMIL1, and UBASH3A. We identified variants in known IBD loci, including in chr2p15 and within the major histocompatibility complex on chr6, exhibiting sex-specific patterns of association (P < 5 × 10-7 in one sex only). We identified 3 chrX associations with IBD, including a novel Crohn's disease susceptibility locus at Xp22. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses identified novel IBD loci, in addition to characterizing sex-specific patterns of associations underlying sex-dimorphic associations. By elucidating the role of sex in IBD genetics, our study will help enhance our understanding of the differences between the sexes in IBD biology and underscores a need to move beyond conventional sex-combined analyses to appreciate the genetic architecture of IBD more comprehensively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".