MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

KontRASt-02: A phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of the KRAS <sup>G12C</sup> inhibitor JDQ443 vs docetaxel in patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic, <i>KRAS G12C</i> -mutated NSCLC.

2023· article· en· W4379280923 on OpenAlexaff
Federico Cappuzzo, Gilberto de Castro, Jin‐Hyoung Kang, Yi‐Long Wu, Odd Terje Brustugun, Parneet Cheema, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Anne-Sophie Longin, Aislyn Boran, Jiawei Duan, Rafael Caparica, Herbert H. Loong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWilliam Osler Health SystemUniversity of Toronto
FundersNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
KeywordsKRASDocetaxelMedicineOncologyInternal medicineChemotherapyCancerContext (archaeology)Lung cancerCancer researchColorectal cancerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS9144 Background: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS) is the most frequent mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). KRAS G12C is the most common KRAS variant, present in ~13% of patients (pts) with non-squamous NSCLC. KRAS G12C mutations cause the accumulation of active, GTP-bound KRAS, which leads to activation of downstream pathways involved in cell proliferation and invasiveness. JDQ443 is a potent, structurally novel, selective KRAS G12C inhibitor that irreversibly traps KRAS G12C in its inactive, GDP-bound form. Data from the JDQ443 monotherapy arm of the first-in-human KontRASt-01 study demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity and an acceptable safety profile of JDQ443 in pts with previously treated, KRAS G12C-mutated, advanced NSCLC. For pts with advanced NSCLC who progress following first-line immunotherapy or doublet platinum-based chemotherapy, single agent docetaxel remains a standard option, although it presents modest activity and is generally poorly tolerated. In this context, alternative treatment options are needed to improve pt outcomes. Methods: KontRASt-02 (NCT05132075) is a global, Phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter study evaluating JDQ443 as a monotherapy in comparison to docetaxel in pts with KRAS G12C-mutated, advanced NSCLC previously treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy (either in combination or as sequential treatments). Approximately 360 pts stratified by ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 and 2) and prior therapy (platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy combined vs sequential) will be randomized at 1:1 to receive 200 mg oral JDQ443 twice daily continuously or 75 mg/m 2 intravenous docetaxel once every 21 days. The primary endpoint of this study is progression-free survival (PFS) per Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) according to RECIST version 1.1. The key secondary endpoint is overall survival (OS); other secondary endpoints include objective response rate, disease control rate, time to response, duration of response, PFS on subsequent therapy, safety of JDQ443 monotherapy, pt-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetics, time to deterioration of ECOG performance status, and safety in pts who crossover from docetaxel to JDQ443. Exploratory objectives include biomarker analyses aimed at investigating predictors of responsiveness to JDQ443. Pts randomized to docetaxel will be allowed to crossover to JDQ443 following confirmed disease progression per BIRC. To allow more pts to be treated with JDQ443, crossover will also be offered to all patients on docetaxel if the primary endpoint (PFS) is met. Treatment beyond progression will be allowed for pts receiving JDQ443 according to investigator judgement. The KontRASt-02 study is currently enrolling pts. Clinical trial information: NCT05132075 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer therapeutics and mechanismsFrench-language works237,207