MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380358639 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad073.219

LGG-09. CLINICAL ACTIVITY OF PAN-RAF INHIBITOR TOVORAFENIB IN THE REGISTRATIONAL PEDIATRIC LOW-GRADE GLIOMA ARM OF THE PHASE 2 FIREFLY-1 (PNOC026) STUDY

2023· article· en· W4380358639 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay Kilburn, Dong‐Anh Khuong‐Quang, Karsten Nysom, Daniel Landi, David S. Ziegler, Pablo Hernáiz Driever, Sarah Leary, Simon Bailey, Jasper van der Lugt, Sébastien Perreault, Angela J. Waanders, Patricia Baxter, Olaf Witt, Darren Hargrave, Geoffrey McCowage, Xin Zhao, Daniel Da Costa, Michael C. Cox, Peter Manley, Jordan R. Hansford

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse effectMedicineGliomaClinical endpointInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchClinical trialOncologySurgeryGastroenterologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Genomic alterations of BRAF are common oncogenic drivers in pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG). Tovorafenib is an investigational, oral, selective, brain-penetrant, small molecule, type II panRAF inhibitor. FIREFLY-1 (NCT04775485) is a multicenter phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of tovorafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF-altered cancers. Registrational arm 1 includes patients 6 months-25 years of age with recurrent or progressive LGG previously treated with ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy. Tovorafenib 420 mg/m2 (≤600 mg) is administered weekly, in 28-day cycles, (tablet or liquid suspension formulation) until progression. The primary endpoint of arm 1 is ORR, as defined by RANO criteria and determined by blinded independent review. As of September 28, 2022, arm 1 had enrolled 77 patients and is fully accrued. All patients had ≥6 months of follow-up. Median age at enrollment was 8 years (range 2-21). Patients had received a median of 3 prior lines of systemic therapy (range: 1-9); 60% had received prior MAPK pathway-targeted agents. The most common tumor site was optic pathway (51%). Sixty-four patients harbored a tumor BRAF fusion/rearrangement (83%) and 13 (17%) a V600E mutation. Median duration of tovorafenib treatment is 8.4 months (range 0.7-16.8); 59 patients (77%) remained on treatment at data cutoff. ORR in 69 RANO-evaluable patients was 64%, [3 CR, 41 PR (10 unconfirmed) and 19 SD] with a clinical benefit rate of 91%. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were hair color changes (75%), increased creatine phosphokinase (64%), anemia (46%), fatigue (42%) and maculopapular rash (42%). Two patients (3%) discontinued tovorafenib due to TRAEs. Updates from a longer follow-up on the 77 patients in arm 1 will be presented. Tovorafenib was generally well tolerated and showed encouraging evidence of antitumor activity in children and young adults with refractory BRAF-altered LGG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207