Abstract 10202: DNA-PKcs: A Novel Therapeutic Target in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease characterized by vascular obliteration of small pulmonary arteries (PAs), notably due to excessive proliferation and resistance to apoptosis of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs). Accumulating evidence indicates that PAH-PASMCs have acquired an over-efficient DNA damage response (DDR) ensuring sensing, signaling, and repair of DNA damages, accounting for their enhanced capacity to survive and proliferate under stressful conditions. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a pivotal component of the DNA repair machinery which plays an instrumental role in the overall survival and proliferation of cancer cells. Based on similarities between PAH and cancer cells, we thus hypothesized that increased expression of DNA-PK contributes to vascular remodeling in PAH. Methods and Results: Using Western blot (WB) and immunohistochemistry, we found that expression and activity of DNA-PK were increased in PAH-PASMCs (n=6) compared to controls (n=6, p<0.01). Similarly, DNA-PK was significantly up-regulated in distal PAs from PAH animal models (i.e. MCT rats and Su/Hx rats and mice, n=5/group, p<0.01). In vitro, the pharmacological inhibition of DNA-PK using AZD-7648 or Nedisertib attenuates PAH-PASMC proliferation (Ki67 and EdU labeling, MCM2, PLK1, and PNCA by WB; p<0.05) and resistance to apoptosis (AnnexinV labeling, Survivin by WB)(n=5 cell lines; p<0.05). These effects were associated with reduced expression of gH2AX. As assessed by echocardiography and right heart catheterization, treatment with AZD7648 improved pulmonary hemodynamics (RVSP, mPAP, and TPR) and right ventricular function (CO, PAT/PET, TAPSE) in Su/Hx mice with established PAH (n=10/group; all p<0.01). Accordingly, pulmonary vascular remodeling (EVG) and the proportion of PCNA-positive PASMCs were reduced in AZD7648-treated Su/Hx mice when compared to vehicle-treated Su/Hx mice (p<0.001). Conclusions: We showed for the first time that DNA-PK is overexpressed in human and experimental PAH and contributes to the pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic phenotype of PAH-PASMCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".