MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 13235: Ischemic Preconditioning and Lazaroid (u-74389g) Administration Similarly Attenuate Ischemia-Reperfusion-Induced Spinal Cord Inflammatory and Apoptotic Responses by Targeting the S100-Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Product Pathway

2022· article· en· W4380995267 on OpenAlexaff
James N. Tsoporis, Amin M. Ektesabi, Shehla Izhar, Claúdia C. dos Santos, Thomas G. Parker, Howard Leong‐Poi, Ioannis Rizos, Apostolos E Apapalois, Stavros K. Toumpoulis, Ioannis K. Toumpoulis

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuroprotectionAnesthesiaSpinal cordIschemiaParaplegiaLumbar Spinal CordInflammationReperfusion injuryPharmacologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Spinal cord injury and subsequent paraplegia represents a devastating complication of thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and spinal cord neuronal apoptosis have been implicated in inflammation and neurodegeneration respectively after ischemia. Hypothesis: We investigated the neuroprotective effects of the steroid antioxidant Lazaroid U-74389G versus conventional ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in a pig model of spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury by examining the expression of pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic S100 members and the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). Methods: Spinal cord ischemia was induced by thoracoabdominal aortic occlusion (TAO). A total of 27 pigs were randomized in four groups. Group I (n=5) sham operation, group II (n=7) TAO for 45min and received placebo, group III (n=8) received 3 doses of Lazaroid (3 mg/kg) 60min and 30min before and at 30min during TAO (duration 45min), and group IV (n=6) TAO for 20min followed by additional TAO for 45min and 80 minutes later. Neurologic evaluation was performed according to Tarlov score (0-4, 4=normal). The lumbar spinal cords were harvested at 7th postoperative day for the expression of inflammatory and apoptotic markers by real-time RT-PCR. Results: Group III and IV had better neurologic outcome postoperatively compared to group II where all animals developed paraplegia (Tarlov scores: 3.5 versus 3.6 versus 0.33, respectively, P<0.001). Group II showed marked pro-inflammatory responses as quantified by 2-4-fold increases in the mRNA of pro-inflammatory S100A6, S100A8 and high-mobility group box 1, and RAGE, compared to group I. Additionally, group II, exhibited apoptosis as quantified by a 40-60% decrease in the mRNA of anti-apoptotic BCL2 and BIRC2, and 2-3-fold increases in pro-apoptotic BAX mRNA and caspase 3 activity. Compared to group II, inflammatory and apoptotic responses were highly attenuated albeit to a similar degree in groups III and IV. Conclusions: In a large animal model very close to the clinical setting, we demonstrated that in addition to IPC, Lazaroid represents an alternative yet effective pharmacologic intervention in reducing spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury following TAO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207