MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381716540 · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011455

XIAP promotes the expansion and limits the contraction of CD8 T cell response through cell extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms respectively

2023· article· en· W4381716540 on OpenAlexafffund
Parva Thakker, Ardeshir Ariana, Stephanie Hajjar, David Cai, Dikchha Rijal, Subash Sad

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Pathogens · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsXIAPCytotoxic T cellCell biologyCD8Inhibitor of apoptosisPriming (agriculture)T cellBiologySecretionEffectorImmunologyProgrammed cell deathCancer researchApoptosisAntigenImmune systemBiochemistryIn vitroCaspase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

XIAP is an endogenous inhibitor of cell death and inactivating mutations of XIAP are responsible for X-linked lymphoproliferative disease (XLP-2) and primary immunodeficiency, but the mechanism(s) behind these contradictory outcomes have been unclear. We report that during infection of macrophages and dendritic cells with various intracellular bacteria, XIAP restricts cell death and secretion of IL-1β but promotes increased activation of NFκB and JNK which results in elevated secretion of IL-6 and IL-10. Poor secretion of IL-6 by Xiap-deficient antigen presenting cells leads to poor expansion of recently activated CD8 T cells during the priming phase of the response. On the other hand, Xiap-deficient CD8 T cells displayed increased proliferation and effector function during the priming phase but underwent enhanced contraction subsequently. Xiap-deficient CD8 T cells underwent skewed differentiation towards short lived effectors which resulted in poor generation of memory. Consequently Xiap-deficient CD8 T cells failed to provide effective control of bacterial infection during re-challenge. These results reveal the temporal impact of XIAP in promoting the fitness of activated CD8 T cells through cell extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms and provide a mechanistic explanation of the phenotype observed in XLP-2 patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS PathogensSame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207