MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381847846 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107198

Daughter cell fate choice instructed preemptively by mother cells facing nutrient limitation

2023· article· en· W4381847846 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dianpeng Zheng, Yaowen Mao, Yinglong Gao, Feng He, Jun Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaZhejiang UniversityWuhan University School of MedicineNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational ResearchBC Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia
KeywordsGlutamineDaughterCell divisionCell biologyCell cycleNutrientCell fate determinationAsymmetric cell divisionBiologyAmino acidCellChemistryBiochemistryEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nutrients are vital to cellular activities, yet it is largely unknown how individual cells respond to nutrient deprivation. Live imaging results show that unlike the removal of amino acids or glutamine that immediately halts cell cycle progression, glucose withdrawal does not prevent cells from completing their current cycle. Although cells that begin to experience glucose withdrawal in S phase give rise to daughter cells with an equal choice of proliferation or quiescence, those enduring such experience in G1 phase give rise to daughter cells that predominantly enter quiescence. This fate choice difference stems from p21 protein accumulated during G2/M of the latter cells. Induced degradation of p21 permits daughter cells to enter S phase but with a consequent accumulation of DNA damage. These results suggest that mother cells that begin to experience glucose limitation in G1 phase take preemptive steps toward preventing daughter cells from making a harmful choice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207