MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382539084 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100304

Optimization of Pyrolysis Operating Parameters for Biochar Production from Palm Kernel Shell Using Response Surface Methodology

2023· article· en· W4382539084 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiocharPalm kernelPyrolysisResponse surface methodologyShell (structure)Production (economics)Kernel (algebra)PalmPulp and paper industryProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceAgricultural engineeringMaterials scienceMathematicsWaste managementEngineeringComposite materialAgroforestryStatisticsPalm oilPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing demand for clean and sustainable energy has catalyzed global efforts toward greener economies and sustainable development.In this study, we investigated palm kernel shell (PKS) biomass obtained from a palm oil mill in Omu-Aran, Nigeria (Latitude 8°08ʹ18.85ʺNand Longitude 5°06ʹ9.36ʺE)as a potential feedstock for biochar production.The biomass underwent pretreatment and sieving into particle size ranges of 0.1-0.2mm, 0.2-0.4mm, 0.4-0.6 mm, 0.6-0.8mm, and 0.8-1.0mm, and was stored in zip-locked polyethylene bags at room temperature for subsequent characterization and pyrolysis experiments.Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to model and optimize the operating parameters of pyrolysis.The maximum biochar yield (41.1 wt%) was achieved under optimal conditions: temperature of 320℃, reaction time of 6.5 min, heating rate of 12.8℃/min, nitrogen flow rate of 25 cm³ /min, and particle size of 0.9 mm.The model exhibited a p-value of 0.05, a high F-value for biochar (340.5), and an R² of 0.9887, signifying its appropriateness, reliability, responsiveness, and accurate prediction of experimental data.A strong correlation between actual and predicted values for biochar yield was observed.Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy revealed the presence of alcohol groups, as evidenced by peaks at 3906.3, 3809.3,3749.7,3649.7,3678.9, and 3600.6 cm⁻¹, as well as alkynes and alkenes, indicated by high-intensity peaks at 2113.4 and 1904.4 cm⁻¹.Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses of the biochar showed white deposits, cleavages, heterogeneous pores, and cloudy formations, indicating inorganic materials and rapid efflorescence during pyrolysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it