MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383710173 · doi:10.1177/13634615231180376

Gender (in)equity in global mental health research: A call to action

2023· article· en· W4383710173 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kelly Rose‐Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueTranscultural Psychiatry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMailman School of Public Health, Columbia UniversityInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do PortoEconomic and Social Research CouncilUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of Cape TownUniversity of DhakaInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College LondonHaramaya UniversityMonash UniversitySouth African Medical Research CouncilUniversity of OxfordUniversity of WarwickUK Research and InnovationMedical Research CouncilPokhara UniversityWellcome TrustUniversity College LondonVanderbilt UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceDurham UniversityOxford Brookes UniversityCardiff UniversityUniversidade do PortoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineGovernment of the United KingdomBirzeit UniversityAddis Ababa UniversityMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalGeorge Washington UniversityKing's College LondonBoston CollegeImperial College LondonUniversity of WashingtonTribhuvan University
KeywordsCall to actionMental healthEquity (law)Global mental healthPsychologyPsychiatryPolitical scienceBusinessAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this commentary, we build on work by Gurung and colleagues which highlighted gender inequity in the global mental health research workforce in Nepal (Gurung et al., 2021). We seek to increase awareness of the under-representation of women in global mental health research and its consequences, and we call for change. By women, we refer to all people who identify as women, including trans people. The commentary is informed by conversations with women who are global mental health researchers in the Global North and South at various stages of their careers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.426
GPT teacher head0.578
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranscultural PsychiatrySame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207