MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4384069979 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdad071.049

TARGETING CANCER STEM CELLS WITH A CDK2 INHIBITOR IN GLIOBLASTOMA

2023· article· en· W4384069979 on OpenAlexaff
Elham Mahmnoudian, Dianbo Qu, Farzaneh Lotfipour, Arezu Jahani‐Asl

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchStem cellCDK inhibitorCyclin-dependent kinaseCancer stem cellBiologyCarcinogenesisCancerCell cycleCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common and aggressive adult brain tumor with no cure. Brain tumor stem cells (BTSCs) are a rare population of self-renewing multipotent stem cells in GB that contribute to tumorigenesis, therapeutic resistance, and tumour recurrence. Here, we report a CDK2 inhibitor that suppresses BTSCs via OSM/OSMR/STAT3 signalling pathway. To begin with, we performed high throughput screening (HTS) of ~8400 compounds including FDA-approved drugs in patient derived human BTSCs that naturally harbour EGFRvIII mutation and elevated STAT3 phosphorylation, in search of compounds that can suppress EGFRvIII/OSMR/STAT3 oncogenic pathway. The screen led to the identification of a panel of CDK inhibitors that possessed important characteristics including a) ability to cross the blood-brain barrier with mall molecular weights of 277-566 kDa, b) low Topological Polar Surface Area (TPSA) of 76-115 A°, c) a low number of Hydrogen Bond Donors (HBDs) (1-4), and d) cLogP values ranging from 2-4. Following counter screens, we focused on a CDK2 inhibitor that significantly and most efficiently reduced OSM/OSMR signalling and STAT3 activation. Importantly, we found that the compound inhibited the self-renewal and growth of BTSCs in EGFRvIII subtype of BTSCs. This research has led to future investigation on in vivo assessment of this CDK2 inhibitor in combination with ionizing radiation and chemotherapy in preclinical models of GB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207