MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4384338991 · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.c.6742664

Data from Spectrum of Response to Platinum and PARP Inhibitors in Germline <i>BRCA</i>–Associated Pancreatic Cancer in the Clinical and Preclinical Setting

2023· preprint· en· W4384338991 on OpenAlexaff
Chani Stossel, Maria Raitses‐Gurevich, Dikla Atias, Tamar Beller, Yulia Glick Gorman, Sharon Halperin, Eyal Peer, Robert E. Denroche, Amy Zhang, Faiyaz Notta, Julie M. Wilson, Grainne M. O’Kane, Elina Haimov Talmoud, Nora Amison, Michael Schvimer, Seth J. Salpeter, Vered Bar, Adi Zundelevich, Itay Tirosh, Rotem Tal, Gal Dinstag, Yaron Kinar, Yonatan Eliezer, Uri Ben‐David, Nancy Gavert, Ravid Straussman, Steven Gallinger, Raanan Berger, Talia Golan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersMinistry of Science, Technology and SpaceHebrew University of JerusalemDeutsches KrebsforschungszentrumTel Aviv UniversityAstraZeneca
KeywordsCancer researchIn vivoPancreatic cancerMedicineOlaparibPARP inhibitorPoly ADP ribose polymeraseCancerInternal medicineOncologyBiologyGenePolymeraseGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Germline BRCA–associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (glBRCA PDAC) tumors are susceptible to platinum and PARP inhibition. The clinical outcomes of 125 patients with glBRCA PDAC were stratified based on the spectrum of response to platinum/PARP inhibition: (i) refractory [overall survival (OS) <6 months], (ii) durable response followed by acquired resistance (OS <36 months), and (iii) long-term responders (OS >36 months). Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were generated from 25 patients with glBRCA PDAC at different clinical time points. Response to platinum/PARP inhibition in vivo and ex vivo culture (EVOC) correlated with clinical response. We deciphered the mechanisms of resistance in glBRCA PDAC and identified homologous recombination (HR) proficiency and secondary mutations restoring partial functionality as the most dominant resistant mechanism. Yet, a subset of HR-deficient (HRD) patients demonstrated clinical resistance. Their tumors displayed basal-like molecular subtype and were more aneuploid. Tumor mutational burden was high in HRD PDAC and significantly higher in tumors with secondary mutations. Anti–PD-1 attenuated tumor growth in a novel humanized glBRCA PDAC PDX model. This work demonstrates the utility of preclinical models, including EVOC, to predict the response of glBRCA PDAC to treatment, which has the potential to inform time-sensitive medical decisions. Significance: glBRCA PDAC has a favorable response to platinum/PARP inhibition. However, most patients develop resistance. Additional treatment options for this unique subpopulation are needed. We generated model systems in PDXs and an ex vivo system (EVOC) that faithfully recapitulate these specific clinical scenarios as a platform to investigate the mechanisms of resistance for further drug development. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1749

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research→French-language works237,207→