On Groundwater Recharge in Variably Saturated Subsurface Flow Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Groundwater models that simulate only saturated flow use groundwater recharge as an input parameter. In contrast, variably saturated subsurface flow models, including integrated surface and subsurface hydrologic models, can jointly simulate the movement of water in the saturated and unsaturated zones. Instead of recharge, they require climate data such as precipitation and potential evapotranspiration. Given that the latter models represent hydrological processes operating throughout the unsaturated zone and at the water table, one might expect that recharge can be readily extracted from them. In this paper, we demonstrate that it is not the case. When the commonly used definitions of groundwater recharge are implemented in variably saturated subsurface flow models, they do not yield meaningful results. Above all, the problems occur because of the storage dynamics in the capillary fringe above the water table. Despite this difficulty, variably saturated subsurface flow models can provide the information required for water resources management directly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".